New Delhi: The Supreme Court reviewed petitions concerning the alleged unlawful detention of journalists during recent demonstrations in the national capital. During the court proceedings, the Centre argued that it has become difficult to differentiate accredited journalists from content creators and reel makers, pointing out that anyone carrying a mobile phone or a microphone can record and publish material online.
In response, the Delhi Police filed a counter-affidavit asserting that protests occurring between October 6 and October 10 were aggressive and driven by individuals operating under the guise of freelance journalism. The top court also examined a proposal to establish an inquiry committee to investigate the detention incidents, requesting that suggested names be submitted in a sealed cover.
Separately, the bench evaluated legal challenges regarding the de-notification of Jantar Mantar as a designated protest venue, questioning whether the Centre had applied proper consideration to the decision. While the government defended the relocation by stating a committee had reviewed the matter, petitioners contended that alternative locations such as Burari, Ramleela, and CBD grounds are remote, costly, and difficult to secure.
The court issued formal notices to the Centre and the Delhi administration to explain the rationale behind moving the demonstration site. In connection with the petitions alleging illegal detentions, the bench ordered the preservation of relevant CCTV footage and instructed the Home Ministry and Delhi Police to place Section 163 prohibitory orders on official record. Furthermore, notice was issued regarding allegations of violence targeting women journalists and lawyers, with the judges agreeing to review proposals for setting up an independent inquiry committee.