🔴 Breaking: Delhi HC Questions Jantar Mantar Stir, Preven...

Delhi HC Questions Jantar Mantar Stir, Preventive Detention And Repeated Breach Of Peace Bonds

The Delhi High Court heard arguments regarding the detention of activists Ashutosh Ranka and Saurav Das following their stir at Jantar Mantar. The bench questioned the petitioners for entering the site after it had been de-notified for protests, noting that breaking barricades poses serious law and order risks. The court cited instances in Europe where student demonstrations morphed into arson and looting, questioning why prior police nod was not obtained. It also raised queries regarding maintainability, asking why alternate remedies before the Special Executive Magistrate court and the district court were not pursued instead. Counsel for the petitioners argued that orders passed by the executive magistrate were arbitrary and pointed out that furnished sureties had been repeatedly rejected on frivolous grounds, infringing upon the right to personal liberty. Meanwhile, the Additional Solicitor General appearing for the police submitted that custody proceedings relate to production and the requirement of proper sureties, as the court deliberated on legal protections under preventive detention laws.

Delhi HC Pulls Up CJP Leaders Over Jantar Mantar Stir, Questions MaintainabilityThe Delhi High Court commenced a crucial hearing concerning a plea filed by Cockroach Janta Party leaders Ashutosh Ranka and Saurav Das challenging their judicial custody orders issued by the Special Executive Magistrate court. During the proceedings, the High Court questioned the leaders for entering Jantar Mantar and breaking barricades after the protest site was de-notified, noting that they had previously executed a peace bond.

Drawing comparisons to European student demonstrations that deteriorated into arson and looting, the court observed that barricades and police permissions serve to maintain public order and prevent external elements from hijacking demonstrations. The bench led by Justice Subramanian Prasad raised queries regarding the maintainability of moving the High Court directly instead of awaiting the Special Executive Magistrate court's scheduled order or approaching the district court.

Counsel for the leaders submitted that sureties had been presented and raised procedural issues regarding the preventive custody orders under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.Marco Rubio in Jamnagar: US Energy Ties, Reliance Refinery & Vantara VisitUS Secretary of State Marco Rubio arrived in Jamnagar on the second day of his visit to India, focusing on energy security and strategic cooperation. The high-profile visit includes an itinerary centered on the Reliance Industries refinery, recognized as the world's largest crude processing facility with a daily capacity of approximately 1.4 million barrels, alongside a scheduled visit to the Vantara animal rescue facility.

Discussions highlight global fuel stability, shipping route vulnerabilities in regions like the Strait of Hormuz, and potential US-India energy partnerships amid rising domestic fuel prices in the United States. Following high-level discussions with External Affairs Minister S.

Jaishankar, Rubio's stopover in Gujarat emphasizes the critical link between refining infrastructure and international energy security.Delhi HC Plea On CJP Leaders Custody, Peace Bond Breach Row & Protest ClampdownThe Delhi High Court is set to hear a petition challenging the continued judicial custody of Cockroach Janata Party leaders Sourav Das and Ashutosh Ranka in Tihar Jail. The duo challenged the 19th October order after a magistrate extended their detention till 21st October and rejected their sureties.

Investigators and police maintain that the leaders deliberately breached their signed peace bond, which barred them from participating in illegal protests for a year. Authorities alleged that the leaders trespassed into the de-notified protest site at Jantar Mantar, breached police barricades, and obstructed public servants from carrying out their duties.

Meanwhile, the petitioners argue that they possess a democratic right to hold peaceful protests, questioning their detention. While party founder Abhijit Dipke called Das and Ranka the real decision-makers and announced a halt on protests until Diwali, opposition voices accused the administration of arbitrarily arresting student leaders and suppressing dissent.Pulivendula Violence: CM Naidu Hits Out at YSRCP; Top Court Grants Relief Over Poll PleaTensions escalated in Andhra Pradesh following reported violence and candidate intimidation in Pulivendula ahead of the local municipal elections.

Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu hit back at the YSR Congress Party, asserting that violence is in their DNA and accusing them of obstructing government initiatives and reservations.

In response to allegations of candidate harassment, shop burning, and vehicles being torched, the YSRCP approached the Supreme Court seeking intervention. Granting relief to the party, the apex court directed the State Election Commission to examine the complaints by 22 October.

Observing that judicial deference cannot render constitutional courts powerless when free and fair elections are at stake, the bench stated that the publication of the final candidates list may be deferred until 25 October if deemed necessary. The directive follows YSRCP's allegations that its candidates faced severe intimidation and obstacles while attempting to file their nomination papers for the local body elections.