In 1994, Namibia’s Cheetah Conservation Fund began placing guard dogs with farmers; a later review found losses fell for most surveyed farmers

Such losses can also put predators at risk of being killed in retaliation. To reduce livestock losses and limit conflict between farmers and wildlife, the Cheetah Conservation Fund (CCF) began placing livestock guarding dogs on Namibian farms in 1994.

A 2021 review covering the program’s first 25 years found that 91% of surveyed farmers reported reduced livestock losses after receiving the dogs.A review of 634 livestock guarding dogs placed on Namibian farms found that 67% of surveyed farmers reported no livestock losses in the year after placement. Farmers also reported fewer predator-related losses and less lethal control, but dogs sometimes killed wild animals, and the survey cannot prove the dogs caused the changes. (AI-generated/ChatGPT)Led by Laurie Marker, the research team examined placements made between 1994 and 2018.

During that period, 634 dogs were placed with farmers. The researchers collected survey data covering 472 dogs through 1,567 farm surveys.

The approach is relevant to cheetah conservation because more than 90% of Namibia’s cheetahs live outside protected areas, according to the review, where they may come into conflict with livestock farmers.How do the dogs help protect livestock?The program uses Anatolian shepherds and Kangal dogs, breeds originating in Turkey that have long been used to guard livestock. Puppies began bonding with small livestock at about 4 weeks old and were placed on farms between 10 and 12 weeks of age, after each farm passed an approval check.

Early exposure helps the dogs develop an association with the herd and remain with the animals as they mature.Deep DiveSurvey responses showed a marked change in reported livestock losses after the dogs arrived. In the year before placement, 19% of respondents said they had lost more than 10 livestock animals, while 7% reported losses exceeding 40 animals.

In the year after placement, 67% reported no livestock losses, while 2% said they had lost more than 10 animals.Reported losses attributed to jackals fell by 45% in the year after a guarding dog was placed. Losses attributed to cheetahs declined by 16%, while those attributed to caracals fell by 15%.

The differences suggest that the reported benefits varied by predator species, with the largest reduction associated with jackals.A 25-year review of Namibia’s Cheetah Conservation Fund program found that most surveyed farmers reported fewer livestock losses after receiving guarding dogs. Losses attributed to jackals fell 45%, while cheetah losses declined 16%. (Representational/Unsplash)Advantages and disadvantages of the programFarmers generally viewed the dogs favorably.

About 93% said the dogs met their expectations, and 99% said they would recommend the program to other farmers. Respondents rated 71% of the dogs in good condition and 22% in excellent condition.Reported use of lethal predator control also declined after placement.

Before receiving a dog, 13% of farmers said they used lethal control; afterward, the figure fell to 8%. The authors described this as a modest reduction that could reflect changing attitudes toward wildlife.

However, the survey cannot establish that the dogs alone caused the decline, and the results do not show that the program eliminated retaliatory killings.The dogs also faced considerable risks. Their average lifespan was 56 months, and 32% of recorded deaths occurred before age 2.

Field accidents were the leading cause of death, with snake bites accounting for more than half of those accidents. Behavioral problems were reported in 28% of surveys, most commonly when dogs stayed at home instead of accompanying the herd.The program also carried potential costs for wildlife.

Reports of dogs killing wild animals, mostly jackals, appeared in 41% of surveys. Most incidents involved individual animals, but a small number of surveys recorded 50 or more jackals killed.

The authors said these ecological effects require further investigation, indicating that guarding dogs can reduce some risks to livestock while creating risks for wild animals.Some unwanted behaviors became less common over time. Dogs surveyed between 2010 and 2018 were 4.47 times less likely to chase game than those surveyed between 1994 and 2001.

The researchers also emphasized the importance of proper care and early supervision in preventing or correcting unwanted behavior.The authors cautioned that the survey results may underestimate livestock losses. Respondents may also have given answers they believed interviewers wanted to hear, potentially affecting the findings.

These limitations mean the reported reductions should be interpreted with care. Nevertheless, the researchers concluded that the program had been successful overall and recommended livestock guarding dogs for other areas experiencing similar livestock losses.The Hindustan Times US Desk brings you the latest news and developments from across the United States.

The team covers everything from breaking news and politics to sports, business, entertainment and stories that are trending across the country. Our coverage includes the White House, Congress, US elections, immigration and visa updates, H-1B, green cards, Social Security, education, jobs, layoffs, the economy, technology and major policy changes.

We also closely follow stories that matter to Indian and South Asian communities in the US. The desk covers major US sports, including the NFL, NBA, MLB and NHL, along with player news, injuries, schedules, results and major events.

Entertainment coverage includes Hollywood, celebrities, television, streaming, music and pop culture. We also report on breaking developments, major incidents, weather, public safety, court cases and other stories making headlines across the country.

When a major policy or news development affects people's everyday lives, the team works to explain what happened, what it means and what readers need to know. Alongside breaking news, the US Desk produces explainers and practical stories on topics such as immigration, Social Security, taxes, education, employment and government programmes.

The team also works on science, tech, business and AI stories analyzing the impact they may have on people. The team follows developments throughout the day, keeping an eye on official announcements, public records, reliable news sources and what people are talking about across the US.Read MoreHuman-wildlife ConflictUs Local NewsNamibiaGet the latest World News, breaking headlines and global updates from the US, UK, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Russia and other countries.

Follow major international events on Hindustan Times.